Colorado Politics

Gun rights groups challenge Colorado’s Proposition KK tax, citing constitutional issues

An El Paso County resident and several gun rights groups have filed a lawsuit against Department of Revenue Executive Director Heidi Humphreys and El Paso County District Attorney Michael Allen over the state’s firearms and ammunition excise tax, which went into effect April 1. 

Known as Proposition KK, the 6.5% excise tax was approved by voters in November’s election. Proceeds from the taxes collected will be used to fund support services for crime victims, veterans, and youth, as well as school safety programs. 

The complaint, filed by Zachary Langston and groups, including the National Rifle Association, Colorado State Shooting Association, and Magnum Shooting Center, argues the tax is unconstitutional under the Supreme Court’s 2022 Bruen decision, in which justices found that in order for a law regarding firearms to be constitutional, it must be supported by “tradition or historical precedent.”

“This infringement-by-taxation scheme is unsupported by this country’s history and tradition of firearm regulation,” the complaint stated. “The only rule that accords with Supreme Court precedent and common sense is that the exercise of protected constitutional rights cannot be singled out for special taxation.”

Gun rights groups have also filed a lawsuit in the San Diego Superior Court against California’s 11% firearms and ammunitions excise tax, which went into effect last July. 

Tags

PREV

PREVIOUS

Colorado judges made campaign contributions despite rules prohibiting the practice

More than a half dozen judges in Colorado — each of them specially appointed and paid to oversee a divorce case since 2019 — has made at least one political campaign contribution while serving in that capacity despite a prohibition against the practice and an affirmation to uphold it, The Denver Gazette has found. Colorado’s Code of Judicial […]

NEXT

NEXT UP

10th Circuit clarifies what judges should do when juries turn in conflicting verdicts

The Denver-based federal appeals court put judges and lawyers on notice Monday that if a jury produces a verdict too confusing to interpret, a judge may ask jurors to reconsider their decision. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit acknowledged its prior decisions did not permit judges to let juries clarify certain kinds […]


Welcome Back.

Streak: 9 days i

Stories you've missed since your last login:

Stories you've saved for later:

Recommended stories based on your interests:

Edit my interests