Colorado Politics

CALDARA | System is stacked against us ratepayers

Jon Caldara

Jon Caldara







Jon Caldara

Jon Caldara



Imagine you’re hauled into court. The prosecutor is paid to get you punished. We all get that.

Now imagine the law changed so that the judge’s job is also to get you punished.

And finally, imagine if your own defense lawyer has to work against you.

Well, that’s pretty much what has happen to you as an energy consumer.

Power utilities play the prosecutor; the Public Utilities Commission is the judge, and the Office of Consumer Council is your court-appointed defense lawyer.

This year’s Senate Bill 103 will make sure everyone in the process who is supposed to financially protect you — gets paid to nail you.

Providing power in Colorado is a monopoly, competition not allowed. A power company could charge whatever it wants, and we’d have to pay it unless we wanted to burn dung in our apartments to keep warm. It’s why utilities like Xcel Energy are highly regulated — to protect us ratepayers from being fleeced.

To that end the state created the Public Utilities Commission, PUC, with one overriding mission — make sure that Coloradans are paying the least cost for their power.

Keep in mind that the PUC still guarantees the power company a profit.

Let’s reflect on that. Guaranteed…to…make…profit. WHATEVER they can convince the PUC is their product cost, they get to slap a big fat profit on it, and we have to pay it.

So, to make even more profit, all they have to do is make sure their costs go up. And environmentalists are happy to assist this goal.

They passed the law to convert coal generators to natural gas, so companies are now paying off two plants instead of one. This old double-dip is passed on to us.

The PUC could require the shareholders of the power company to pay the cost, like in a competitive industry, but they don’t.

Mandated wind farms and solar means more things to buy, increasing cost. Then add the guaranteed profit on that too.

Most folks don’t know that wind farms and solar need backup generators because the wind doesn’t always blow, and the sun doesn’t always shine, and new power lines are needed to get to those backup generators. More costs to pass on with more guaranteed profit!

Forget double-dipping, it’s quadruple-dipping. Energy companies aren’t in the energy business anymore. Their financial incentive is to be in the building-stuff-to-pass-along-costs business.

Good thing the PUC’s first and overriding goal is to keep prices down! But wait. That’s no longer their goal. A few years back the PUC changed its mission to environmental protection, but you know, in a cost-effectivy way, of course.

Power at least cost is the polar opposite of feel-good green energy.

The PUC stood as the judge, the referee to make sure utilities played fair. With this change in their mission, they might as well take off their ref’s zebra uniform and put on the energy company’s uniform and enjoy the cheers from the greenies in the stands.

The very last bit of consumer protection working families have is the under-powered Office of Consumer Counsel, OCC, the defense lawyer you get for free when you can’t afford a good one.

The OCC’s job is to act on behalf of us ratepayers and argue in front of the PUC that they (the PUC) shouldn’t approve a rate increase.

Good thing the OCC’s first and overriding goal is to keep prices down! But wait. That might not be their goal anymore.

Senate Bill 103, sponsored by the green-energy-by-gunpoint team of Stephen Fenberg and Faith Winter, would change the mission of the OCC from protecting your wallet to promoting environmental activism.

It would require OCC to work on “statutory decarbonization goals,” “just transition” and “environmental justice,” rather than cost when deciding to fight a rate increase.

Nothing says looking out for the working family’s pocketbook like forcing them to pay for “environmental justice.”

And in a true insider’s game of governmental manipulation SB-103 changes the OCC from a Type 1 agency to a Type 2 agency. What’s the difference? It takes away the agency’s autonomy and puts it under the control of the governor’s office via the head of his Department of Regulatory Affairs.

That cabinet member works explicitly for Gov. Polis — who has been green-whipped by the looney wing of his party — not for you nor your pocketbook

Welcome, dear defendant, to Colorado’s kangaroo energy court.

Tags

PREV

PREVIOUS

POINT | Why give cover to lawbreaking immigrants?

John Cooke We have a crisis at our southern border. Detention facilities are operating at over 100% capacity, and the pictures taken by Republican senators who visited reveal abysmal conditions. Last week, children were filmed being thrown over a 10-foot wall. Also read: COUNTERPOINT | Shielding immigrants makes sense Now, overwhelmed with the surge, the […]

NEXT

NEXT UP

HUDSON | 'Public option'? Maybe not this year

Miller Hudson With World War II approaching, Winston Churchill described the Soviet Union as “a riddle, wrapped in a mystery, inside an enigma.” Much the same can be said today regarding the cost structure of American health care. Everyone acknowledges its price is far too high and reaches too few. Over the past half century […]


Welcome Back.

Streak: 9 days i

Stories you've missed since your last login:

Stories you've saved for later:

Recommended stories based on your interests:

Edit my interests