Colorado Politics

Spoilers | CALDARA

Jon Caldara

As Republicans digest how the last election could be an extinction-level event for their party in Colorado, some of their political grief might well turn to blaming spoilers.

When a candidate wins, but doesn’t win by more than 50% of the vote, it means some third-party yahoo entered the race and “spoiled” it for the guy who came in second.

Mostly this gripe is reserved for Libertarians (note the large “L” to denote the actual Libertarian party) who ruined it for the Republican.

Once upon a time Democrats had a similar problem. Some crazed nut-job in the Green Party would run in a state House or Senate district and pull enough votes away from the Democrat candidate to swing the victory to the Republican.

And, for a short period, there seemed to be some degree of parity in this Game of Spoilers – not quite a détente, but at least both sides got wounded.

Then Colorado Democrats did what they seem to do. They turned it into their political advantage. They took the entire Green Party Manifesto and absorbed it into Democratic Party gospel. After which the Green Party didn’t really need to exist here to shut down fossil fuels and mandate unaffordable, unreliable renewables. The Democratic Party would do it even better and faster.

The Democrats merely out greened the Green Party.

The Republican Party did the opposite to Libertarians. On the relatively few issues that separate them – but do so violently like the drug war, gay rights, assistance in dying – the Republican Party shunned Libertarians. But Colorado, at least on social issues, did not.

Colorado went on to legalize marijuana and mushrooms, as well and aid in dying at the ballot box.

When Colorado Republicans were in control of the state House a Civil Unions bill with protections for religious objections (like cake bakers) was moving toward passage until Republican leadership shot it down instead. This opened the wallets of the ultra-wealthy, gay-rights super team of Tim Gill, Pat Stryker, Rutte Bridges and Jared Polis, leading to the Democratic takeover of the state.

Had the Republicans just passed Civil Unions back then, who knows what might be different today. And the sad part for them? Although they couldn’t have seen it coming, it wasn’t long after shutting the door on civil unions that the U.S. Supreme Court legalized gay marriage altogether.

If Republicans were more libertarian then, Colorado might not be so socialist now.

Libertarians say they pull votes away from both the Democrats and the Republicans, roughly equally. I have a hard time buying that, and certainly the losing Republican doesn’t buy it.

In Colorado’s new 8th Congressional District, the Libertarian candidate, Richard Ward, pulled in nearly 4% of the votes. Democrat Yadira Caraveo defeated Republican Barb Kirkmeyer by a victory of a mere 0.73%. The Libertarian brought in five times that difference.

The Libertarian cost Kirkmeyer her seat. Absolutely. Chalk one up for spoiler.

Need a clearer example? Colorado’s State Board of Education, like the rest of the state’s governments, are firmly in the hands of the Democrats. In the 8th District, Democrat Rhonda Solis beat Republican Peggy Propst by 0.88%. But the Constitutional Party candidate brought in 2.24%.

Though Libertarians make a weak but plausible argument that they pull votes equally from Rs and Ds, the Constitution Party only pulls from Republicans. They are only voters who feel the Republican Party has gone too squishy on them.

In State House District 25, Republican incumbent Colin Larsen lost to the Democrat, also with a Libertarian making the margin of difference. But the numbers are much tighter in this race.

And that’s it. Two cases where spoilers absolutely caused the Republican defeat and one maybe. Outside of that, spoilers were a non-factor in some 35 other races.

Republicans would be wise to accept Colorado is not a socially conservative state anymore. But as seen by the 21-point victory of our income tax cut, we might still be a fiscally conservative state.

There MAY be a libertarian (note the small “l”) path forward for Republicans here. Another lesson from the Dems if Rs care to listen.

And it would be better still if voters didn’t throw their votes away on protest candidates that can’t win no matter how much they dislike the candidates that can.

Jon Caldara is president of the Independence Institute in Denver and hosts “The Devil’s Advocate with Jon Caldara” on Colorado Public Television Channel 12. His column appears Sundays in Colorado Politics.

Tags

PREV

PREVIOUS

Dem gerrymander fuels state legislature domination | CRONIN & LOEVY

Tom Cronin and Bob Loevy It was supposed to be a horse race. With predictions of a Republican red wave sweeping the nation prior to Election Day 2022, the Republicans in Colorado were hoping to improve their numbers in the Colorado state House of Representatives and perhaps even gain a majority in the Colorado state […]

NEXT

NEXT UP

How will Biden lead between now and 2024? | HUDSON

Miller Hudson For half a century Joe Biden has been the “Where’s Waldo?” of American politics. Look closely enough and you can usually discern his fingerprints on major legislative initiatives across recent decades – from the “Violence against Women Act” to the 1990s ban on automatic weapons. Yet his political journey has not been without its […]


Welcome Back.

Streak: 9 days i

Stories you've missed since your last login:

Stories you've saved for later:

Recommended stories based on your interests:

Edit my interests