Colorado Politics

EDITORIAL: Mayor, what’s in a name?

Strong mayor or weak mayor, what really matters is a manifest shortage of leadership in the city of Pueblo’s municipal government.

Call it anything you want, it still comes down to leadership. In the final analysis, a popularly elected mayor will be only as effective as the person bestowed the title. In a perfect world, the city of Pueblo needs a person – or persons – of the strength and vision to be true leaders.

In a special City Charter election on April 6, 1954, Puebloans voted 8,632-to-7,093, or nearly 60 percent, to adopt a council-manager form of government. We still operate under this elected City Council, council-appointed city manager setup going on 63 years now.

Read more at The Pueblo Chieftain.

Tags

PREV

PREVIOUS

EDITORIAL: Denver goes Gaylord with convention center

Denver voters approved a tourism tax increase in 2015, after city officials told them it would generate $104 million for improvements to the Colorado Convention Center. It was honest, fair and legal under Colorado’s Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights. It was arguably a wise investment in a public asset that benefits all Coloradans who attend events […]

NEXT

NEXT UP

EDITORIAL: Aurora officials’ junket spending most certainly is the public’s business

There seems to be a cloud of confusion over Aurora’s so-called sister cities program and in particular a recent trip by some city officials to South Korea. We’ll clear the air. Despite what some city lawmakers have said off and on the council dais regarding queries about expenses for a May junket to Seongnam City […]


Welcome Back.

Streak: 9 days i

Stories you've missed since your last login:

Stories you've saved for later:

Recommended stories based on your interests:

Edit my interests