I joined Colorado’s solar industry six years ago as a consultant for Sunrun solar company. I believe in the benefits of going solar so much that my home is now 100 percent solar-powered. I love being part of our state’s rapid transition to a cleaner and competitive energy future, and I want everyone I meet with to realize the advantages of going solar. With each solar installation, we are providing savings to customers and creating energy choice for Coloradans across our state.

It’s no coincidence that Colorado’s solar sector is thriving. Colorado has been paving the way to foster a clean energy economy for years. Back in 2004, we passed the nation’s first ballot initiative for a renewable energy standard. And just last August, after nearly two years of discussions, Gov. John Hickenlooper’s appointed Public Utilities Commission decided to maintain the state’s solar net metering policy. This policy enables the right to self-generation and fair credit for power sent to neighbors, and is fundamental to successful solar markets in 42 states.

Since then, our clean energy economy has grown significantly. Colorado is a top 10 state for solar jobs and installed solar capacity. The company that I work for, Sunrun, opened its second corporate headquarters in Denver last year and plans to employ 800 people. Colorado’s innovative workforce and strong policy environment for solar was part and parcel of my company’s decision to move to the state.

Unfortunately, Xcel Energy is now attempting to thwart our solar progress with its latest rate proposal.

Xcel’s proposal to restructure electricity rates would levy a new confusing monthly fee on all customers. The fee makes going solar unfinanceable, which could result in job loss, less energy choice for Coloradans, and more climate pollution. It’s clear that Coloradans want solar, but Xcel is looking for a second bite at the apple to eliminate rooftop solar competition. Xcel was already denied its request to end the pro-solar policy of net metering, so now the monopoly utility wants to find another way to maintain its captive customer base by making solar less attractive. I am not a parent, but when you say “no” to your kids and they come back and ask the same question in a different way, they should get the same answer.

I know from experience as a solar consultant that people want a simple solution that shows them savings. The proposed rate case will only further confuse consumers about the benefits of solar.

Colorado has the momentum, and we should continue to lead the charge to develop a thriving clean energy industry in our state. That’s what I do every day when I go to work. Fair policies are the most effective way for Colorado to continue to grow its solar market, allowing energy choice for me and my neighbors. Xcel’s current proposal for “Our Energy Future” will only take us backwards.

To protect consumer choice, solar jobs, and a clean energy future for our children, Colorado’s Public Utilities Commission should deny Xcel’s latest proposal.