road rage
-
Colorado Supreme Court finds Aurora police committed no Miranda violation when interrogating suspect
—
by
Aurora police did not need to provide a Miranda warning to a road rage suspect before interrogating him outside his apartment building in an accusatory manner, the Colorado Supreme Court ruled on Monday. Under the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Miranda v. Arizona, law enforcement must inform suspects of their constitutional rights to remain silent…
-
Colorado justices skeptical Aurora officer committed Miranda violation on road rage suspect
—
by
Members of the Colorado Supreme Court appeared skeptical last week that a road rage suspect was “in custody” at the time an Aurora police officer interrogated him, as the state’s second-highest court believed was the case. Under the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Miranda v. Arizona, police must inform a suspect of their rights to…
-
Colorado justices tentatively agree that judges’ appearance of bias can matter in criminal appeals
—
by
Although members of the Colorado Supreme Court on Tuesday seemed unconvinced that an El Paso County judge should have recused herself from a case because she was previously the victim of a similar crime, the court was less receptive to the government’s position that a judge’s appearance of bias can almost never be grounds for…
-
Split appeals court rules Aurora police needed to give Miranda warning to road rage suspect
—
by
Colorado’s second-highest court has reversed a man’s assault convictions in Arapahoe County because police failed to provide a Miranda warning at the point when their interrogation effectively placed the defendant in custody. A panel of the Court of Appeals decided, by 2-1, that while Aurora police did not need to advise Terrence Kenneth Eugene of…
-
Judge who was victim of crime did not have to recuse herself from trial, appeals court rules
—
by
An El Paso County judge who disclosed that she was the victim of a crime similar to the one a defendant was charged with did not need to recuse herself from presiding over the trial, the state’s Court of Appeals has determined. A three-judge appellate panel believed Khalil Jamandre Sanders had a legitimate argument that the…
-
Defendants may claim harassment in self-defense, state Supreme Court rules
—
by
People may assert that they committed harassment in self-defense, the Colorado Supreme Court ruled on Monday, finding that an Arapahoe County judge mistakenly failed to instruct a jury that they could acquit a tow truck driver if they believed he punched another motorist to defend himself. Under state law, the crime of harassment involves striking…
