Colorado Politics

Big-win Panasonic project figures for and against Denver’s aerotropolis

It’s the enormous “get” that made Denver Mayor Michael Hancock’s “aerotropolis” project seem suddenly like something that could be realized.

Last year, Panasonic Enterprise Solutions was looking at 22 cities for a place to land before deciding in December to commit to Denver. The company plans to build a new technology center and business hub on private land just outside the airport that will develop and manufacture video screens and scoreboards, as well as solar energy systems and batteries. The project is projected to bring 400 new jobs and $82 million in business to the region. Panasonic President Jim Doyle told news outlets that the company was drawn to Denver by the big-vision concept touted by Hancock, in which the airport is less a mere transportation hub and more of a city of the future, supporting businesses and lifestyles of the global networked era increasingly defined by speed and mobility.







Big-win Panasonic project figures for and against Denver’s aerotropolis

Benny Wood and brothers Manuel and Miguel Lopez celebrate quitting time at the end of a long day excavating at the site of the Panasonic development near East 61st Avenue and Tower Road in Denver.Photo by Jennifer Goodland/The Colorado Statesman



You see, supporters say to Denver and Adams County voters, just pass ballot proposal 1A, and vigorous new businesses will come and tax money will rain down. This is how public-private partnerships are leveraged to make big things happen.

Not so fast, say skeptics.

Panasonic was lured by more than a big vision: Denver piled on typical kinds of incentives, as well, in the form of a $1.5 million tax credit and $1.35 million to pay for local job creation and startup building and operational costs. What’s more, the Panasonic complex will be part of a mixed-use development that will be supported by an RTD rail station and public facilities.

That all sounds great, say opponents of the initiatives, but what we’re talking about is corporate welfare — give a little, and it turns into a lot. It’s a recipe for cronyism, says free-marketeer Mike Krause of the libertarian-leaning Independence Institute. Incentives beget incentives, and it can all go south fast.

Nonsense, says Adams County Commissioner Erik Hansen, a strong proponent of the ballot measures that would spur development like the Panasonic village. He said for residents of Denver and Adams County, voting for 1A is a no-brainer.

“This is a heckuva deal for taxpayers,” he says. “No increase in taxes, debts or noise — but, yes, an increase in revenue.”

john.tomasic@gmail.com


PREV

PREVIOUS

Fifteen years later, Colorado makes permanent an anti-poverty tax credit for working families

It’s a wonky tax program that puts hundreds and thousands of dollars into the pockets of low-income workers. Researchers call it the best general anti-poverty program going and laud it in particular as a low-cost, high-return policy that lifts up working parents when they need it most and benefits the children of those parents over […]

NEXT

NEXT UP

Dobbs: Middle East becoming more complex, less predictable

Greg Dobbs says the Middle East has changed a great deal since he covered the region for ABC News, and not necessarily for the better. The now-retired Dobbs, an international correspondent for 10 of his 23 years with the network, shared his analysis of the current climate and anecdotes from his time in the field […]


Welcome Back.

Streak: 9 days i

Stories you've missed since your last login:

Stories you've saved for later:

Recommended stories based on your interests:

Edit my interests