Letter: Reject false choice between crude exports, climate goals
Editor:
World energy demand will grow a projected 37 percent by 2040, according to the International Energy Agency, and about three-quarters of demand will be met by fossil fuels. Failing to lift the ban on U.S. crude exports won’t reduce the pivotal role played by oil and natural gas in meeting the world’s energy needs. But it could increase the share of energy supplied by nations with less stringent environmental controls than those followed by U.S. producers.
Numerous s independent, nonpartisan, and government agencies have published reports that confirm the economic and security benefits of U.S. crude oil exports. The facts show that overturning the ’70s-era ban will create American jobs, put downward pressure on gasoline prices, and enhance security for the United States and our allies, who continue to seek alternatives to oil from countries like Russia and Iran.
The United States leads the world in both emissions reductions and in oil and natural gas production. Our success demonstrates that environmental progress and energy production are not mutually exclusive. Lifting the ban could bring nearly 5,000 jobs to our state, and Colorado should be proud of its bipartisan support to lift this outdated ban and for recognizing the positive economic impact it could have on our state and others. Reject the false choice between U.S. energy exports and climate goals.
Tracee BentleyExecutive Director, Colorado Petroleum CouncilDenver

