dui
-

Colorado Supreme Court ponders role of juries in evaluating prior convictions
—
by
More than two years ago, when the Colorado Supreme Court found that juries, not judges, must decide if people accused of felony drunk driving are repeat offenders, it prompted defendants found guilty of other offenses to wonder whether their own prior convictions were something prosecutors must prove to juries beyond a reasonable doubt. In two…
-

Colorado Supreme Court critical of prosecutors’ misleading presentation of evidence
—
by
Members of the Colorado Supreme Court on Tuesday pushed back against the notion that prosecutors can paint a misleading picture of a criminal defendant’s guilt by shielding the jury from evidence the defendant did not commit an offense after all. In a pair of cases argued before the justices, the government asserted the state’s Court…
-

Colorado Supreme Court accepts cases on forced blood draws, mineral rights
—
by
The Colorado Supreme Court agreed to review two cases on appeal in the past two weeks, with one questioning the constitutionality of forced blood testing on suspected drunk drivers and the other involving a dispute over oil and gas rights underneath a public street in Greeley. At least three of the court’s seven members must…
-

Selling alcohol to drunk driver not enough to hold liquor store liable for deaths, court says
—
by
Businesses are not liable for injuries caused by a drunk driver if they sold alcohol to the already-intoxicated motorist, but the person did not consume it before causing an accident, Colorado’s second-highest court ruled last month. A three-judge panel for the Court of Appeals answered a question never addressed before: Whether the state’s Dram Shop…
-

State Supreme Court takes up 2 drunk driving appeals, case about campus sexual misconduct
—
by
The Colorado Supreme Court on Monday agreed to review three appeals that implicate the state’s drunk driving laws and the legal obligation of universities to conduct fair investigations into alleged sexual misconduct. At least three of the court’s seven members must consent to review a case. One appeal raises yet another angle in the long-running fallout…
-

State Supreme Court takes on homeowner insurance issue, shows interest in 2 criminal cases
—
by
The Colorado Supreme Court on Monday agreed to decide whether two Boulder County homeowners may pursue their insurance claim for hail damage, even though they reported it to their insurer 10 days beyond their policy’s deadline. The legal question and facts are virtually identical to another case the court accepted in December out of Denver, Gregory…
-

Divided state Supreme Court says juries may hear defendants’ drunk driving histories
—
by
A majority of the Colorado Supreme Court ruled on Monday that juries must learn about a defendant’s prior drunk driving offenses at the same time they hear the current allegations of drunk driving, over the strenuous objection of three justices who said the move all but ensures a conviction will occur. By 4-3, the Supreme…
-

In rare move, appeals court reverses itself to concede unlawful search
—
by
After taking an extraordinary third look at a criminal appeal out of Gilpin County, Colorado’s second-highest court this week made the rare move of withdrawing its prior decisions and reversing the defendant’s drug conviction. Nearly 11 months after it first concluded a sheriff’s deputy lawfully seized a sunglasses case from Robert Scott Schweizer’s van that contained methamphetamine, a…
-

State Supreme Court continues to ponder headaches of DUI ruling
—
by
Colorado’s Supreme Court justices this week once again heard about the difficulties they created by upending prosecutions of felony drunk driving cases nearly two years ago. Although driving under the influence in Colorado is typically a misdemeanor, the legislature in 2015 established a felony DUI offense for people who have at least three prior drunk…


