custody
-
Colorado Supreme Court permits Boulder prosecutors to use murder suspect’s statements to police
—
by
The Colorado Supreme Court ruled on Monday that prosecutors in Boulder County may use a murder suspect’s statements to police as evidence because officers did not need to give the defendant a Miranda warning prior to asking about all of the blood on him. Brandon Mason Bohler stands accused of first-degree murder for fatally stabbing…
-
Colorado Supreme Court permits Boulder prosecutors to use murder suspect’s statements to police
—
by
The Colorado Supreme Court ruled on Monday that prosecutors in Boulder County may use a murder suspect’s statements to police as evidence because officers did not need to give the defendant a Miranda warning prior to asking about all of the blood on him. Brandon Mason Bohler stands accused of first-degree murder for fatally stabbing…
-
Colorado Supreme Court permits Boulder prosecutors to use murder suspect’s statements to police
—
by
The Colorado Supreme Court ruled on Monday that prosecutors in Boulder County may use a murder suspect’s statements to police as evidence because officers did not need to give the defendant a Miranda warning prior to asking about all of the blood on him. Brandon Mason Bohler stands accused of first-degree murder for fatally stabbing…
-
Colorado Supreme Court intervenes in case of father who spent only 2 hours with children in 2.5 years
—
by
In a brief order issued last week, the Colorado Supreme Court granted relief to a father who has only spent two hours of parenting time with his children since November 2020, stemming from the strict terms of his 2018 divorce. When Jason Strong divorced his wife, Kassandra Webb-Galarza, an Adams County judge created three phases…
-
By 4-3, Supreme Court says no Miranda warning necessary for man repeatedly told he was under arrest
—
by
Even though Longmont police warned a man four times he was under arrest, told him “we are going to take you to jail” and stood in his doorway, the Colorado Supreme Court on Monday ruled that the man was not effectively in custody at the time. The 4-3 decision from the Supreme Court meant the…
-
Colorado justices to consider financial penalties on lawyers, notice for evictions under COVID rules
—
by
The Colorado Supreme Court announced on Monday that it will hear an appeal implicating the ability of law firms to financially penalize their attorneys for leaving for another job and taking clients with them. The justices also signaled they will decide whether a federal law enacted during the early COVID-19 pandemic still requires certain landlords…
-
Claims of tribal heritage not enough to trigger ‘Indian child’ protections, state justices say
—
by
Family members’ assertions that a child has American Indian heritage are insufficient to trigger the longstanding federal protections for tribal children in welfare proceedings, the Colorado Supreme Court ruled on Monday. The justices resolved an issue that has split the state’s Court of Appeals and focused attention on a key section of the Indian Child…
-
Appeals court decides 2-1 on standard for restricting parents’ custody
—
by
A divided panel of the state’s Court of Appeals has clarified the circumstances under which judges can restrict a parent’s time with their children, in a case complicated by the contradictory orders of a Jefferson County magistrate. Under Colorado law, a divorced parent can ask a judge to restrict their ex-spouse’s custody if there are…
-
Is naming a tribe enough? State Supreme Court weighs when federal Indian child law applies
—
by
Congress enacted the Indian Child Welfare Act more than 40 years ago to combat the forcible removal of American Indian children from their homes for placement into non-tribal families and institutions. In doing so, the law recognized tribal nations have an interest in state courts’ custody proceedings involving their members. Now, the Colorado Supreme Court…
