This November, Denver voters will decide whether to renew the city’s longstanding franchise agreement with Xcel Energy.

Members of the Denver City Council approved on Monday sending a proposed 20-year franchise agreement with Xcel that would deliver more than $180 million a year in franchise fees, infrastructure relocation savings and other undergrounding funds to the ballot.

The vote was 10-2 with Councilmembers Shontel Lewis and Sarah Parady holding the two dissenting votes.

“Denver has negotiated the strongest energy partnership agreement in the history of Colorado, and importantly, the benefits of this agreement and of being a franchisee extend far beyond any of the individual listed improvements and accomplishments,” said Jonathan Rogers, deputy director of Denver’s Climate Office.

Additionally, Denver would get “strong standing, oversight and negotiating power” at the Public Utilities Commission, according to city officials.

The franchise agreement would allow Denver to intervene in rate cases on behalf of residents. It would also help reduce costs and accelerate infrastructure projects across the city.

“We estimate that cost savings at $150 million a year, because keep in mind the franchise agreement is what requires Xcel Energy to move their own infrastructure when the city has public works projects,” Rogers said. “So Xcel Energy covers the entire cost of that relocation throughout the city when it is necessary as part of a city project; it also allows us to have additional utility investments and pilot project opportunities that are further expanded in the energy partnership agreement, which we will walk you through.”

The new deal would also lock in a 3% franchise fee projected at about $34 million next year to the General Fund and dedicate about $10 million a year — 1% of electric gross revenues — for city-directed undergrounding of overhead lines.

Should voters not approve the deal, Denver could face significant financial and operational consequences.

The city would lose the $34 million franchise fee that would otherwise support the General Fund. The responsibility for utility relocation costs would become less certain, and city officials have said that could result in delays and higher costs for projects.

The current agreement, in place since 2007, has already saved Denver taxpayers an estimated $3 billion by requiring Xcel to cover the cost of relocating its facilities during city public works projects.

While the franchise agreement establishes the formal partnership between the city and Xcel Energy to deliver utility services, the city has also negotiated a companion agreement to advance additional community-informed energy priorities. 

Close to two dozen individuals signed up for a special one-hour courtesy hearing, with strong support from local labor organizations eyeing new and continued job opportunities.

Opponents, including Together Colorado — a nonpartisan community organization that organizes residents around public issues such as housing and energy — argue that neighborhoods will continue to face rising costs, unreliable service and missed opportunities for climate progress.

“I believe that this moment in Denver, we are making the decision whether to be part of this great journey or to cling stubbornly to the destructive but familiar corporate profit model,” resident Ann Karlberg told members of City Council. “To say a courageous no to Xcel and send them back to the negotiating table means taking a risk, but not insisting on a better, more visionary collaboration means taking a far greater risk that will keep us stuck in the same old model of corporate greed over human need for the next 20 years.”

Councilmember Kevin Flynn said he “struggles to be impressed with the package but acknowledges the substantial improvement over last year’s rejected deal.”

The companion agreement would require Xcel to contribute a $2.5 million one-time shareholder-funded donation in 2027 for bill payment assistance and $125,000 annually in shareholder funds for income-qualified affordability programs.

It would also allocate at least 1% of each substation construction budget to neighborhood-compatible design improvements, backed by a citywide good-neighbor agreement that incorporates neighborhood input.

At-large Councilmember Sarah Parady criticized the $125,000 annual low-income energy assistance as insufficient.

An additional $2 million annual carve-out from the franchise fee would support programs such as heat pumps or electric vehicles. Xcel would fund $250,000 a year for Energy Resource Navigators selected through a third-party process.

Denver Gazette reporter Scott Weiser contributed to this story