Colorado Politics

Senate approves bill to give Colorado 2 more federal judges

The U.S. Senate unanimously approved a bill on Thursday that would add judgeships to Colorado’s federal trial court for the first time in 40 years.

The bipartisan JUDGES Act would expand the size of district courts across the country in two-year increments over the next decade. Colorado’s U.S. District Court currently has seven presidentially appointed judges, and the number under the bill would increase to nine by 2033.

The Judicial Conference of the United States, which is the governing body for the federal courts, has repeatedly recommended Congress give two additional judgeships to Colorado based on caseloads. Data from 2022 showed 558 cases filed per judge on Colorado’s federal trial court, a higher number than neighboring states‘ courts.

(function(w,d,s,i){w.ldAdInit=w.ldAdInit||[];w.ldAdInit.push({slot:11095963150525286,size:[0, 0],id:”ld-2426-4417″});if(!d.getElementById(i)){var j=d.createElement(s),p=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];j.async=true;j.src=”//cdn2.lockerdomecdn.com/_js/ajs.js”;j.id=i;p.parentNode.insertBefore(j,p);}})(window,document,”script”,”ld-ajs”);

Last year, U.S. Sens. Michael Bennet and John Hickenlooper and U.S. Rep. Joe Neguse re-introduced the Colorado Judgeship Act, after a previous version of the bill failed to advance in the prior Congress. The number of active judges authorized on the U.S. District Court for Colorado has held steady since 1984, even though the state’s population has nearly doubled in the last 39 years.

This year, Neguse again put forward legislation, this time tying the increase in Colorado judgeships to one additional seat on Idaho’s trial court.

The JUDGES Act now awaits consideration by the U.S. House of Representatives.

(function(w,d,s,i){w.ldAdInit=w.ldAdInit||[];w.ldAdInit.push({slot:11095961405694822,size:[0, 0],id:”ld-5817-6791″});if(!d.getElementById(i)){var j=d.createElement(s),p=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];j.async=true;j.src=”//cdn2.lockerdomecdn.com/_js/ajs.js”;j.id=i;p.parentNode.insertBefore(j,p);}})(window,document,”script”,”ld-ajs”);


PREV

PREVIOUS

Appeals judge warns about 'inflammatory' medical terminology in child abuse cases

One member of Colorado’s second-highest court suggested last month that certain medical terminology deeming a child’s injuries “abusive” or “nonaccidental” may improperly lead jurors to convict defendants of knowingly committing child abuse. A three-judge panel of the Court of Appeals upheld the El Paso County child abuse convictions of Susan Trahan Bergeron, who is serving 10 […]

NEXT

NEXT UP

Appeals court to trial judges: the buck stops with you to make a decision on magistrates' work

Colorado’s second-highest court on Thursday reminded trial judges their role in reviewing the decisions of magistrates requires them to take the final action, not to send an issue back to a magistrate for further work. Magistrates are judicial employees who are not judges but who handle aspects of cases in the trial courts. Litigants may consent […]


Welcome Back.

Streak: 9 days i

Stories you've missed since your last login:

Stories you've saved for later:

Recommended stories based on your interests:

Edit my interests