us district court
-
An obligation to use AI? Federal judge addresses lawyers on responsible technology use
—
by
U.S. Magistrate Judge Maritza Dominguez Braswell addressed a group of Colorado attorneys on Friday with the message that they should be practicing and understanding how to use artificial intelligence because it is encroaching on more and more aspects of society. “There was a time when you had to be rich to have a cell phone,”…
-
Federal courts prepare for lengthy shutdown, SCOTUS to hear Colorado case | COURT CRAWL
—
by
Welcome to Court Crawl, Colorado Politics’ roundup of news from the third branch of government. Colorado’s federal courts have announced their intentions if the lapse in congressional funding is prolonged, plus the nation’s highest court is scheduled to hear oral arguments in a First Amendment challenge out of Colorado. In federal news • Both the U.S.…
-
Colorado’s federal courts announce preparations if shutdown is prolonged
—
by
The federal trial and appeals courts headquartered in Denver have announced anticipated changes to their operations should the lapse in congressional appropriations be prolonged, with Oct. 17 being a critical date for the judiciary. In an Oct. 1 letter to all federal judges, public defenders and related staff, Robert J. Conrad Jr., who heads the…
-
Federal court considers ‘smart glasses’ ban, 10th Circuit holds annual conference | COURT CRAWL
—
by
Welcome to Court Crawl, Colorado Politics’ roundup of news from the third branch of government. Colorado’s federal trial court is proposing new rules to ban “smart glasses” in the courthouse, while the Denver-based federal appeals court recently held its annual judges’ conference. State Supreme Court • Of the eight new opinions the Supreme Court has issued…
-
Judicial recusals on Colorado’s federal trial court, state Supreme Court examines family law system | COURT CRAWL
—
by
Welcome to Court Crawl, Colorado Politics’ roundup of news from the third branch of government. Colorado’s federal judges recused themselves from cases more than 200 times in four years, plus one of the state’s justices indicated the Colorado Supreme Court is looking at ways to improve the family law system. Heard on appeal • The Colorado…
-
Colorado’s federal judges recused 200+ times in 4 years for variety of reasons
—
by
Colorado’s federal judges issued orders recusing themselves from cases at least 203 times in four years, with reasons ranging from unspecified appearances of partiality to potential conflicts created by their prior employment and family connections. One judge also noted in recusing himself that if he ruled against an attorney who was his personal friend, “it…
-
Colorado’s federal trial judges keep backlogs steady, but data show discrepancies
—
by
Colorado’s federal trial judges collectively had 71 motions in civil cases that had been sitting on their dockets for at least six months without a ruling as of March 31, according to recently released data from the judiciary. However, the reported information contains discrepancies, and at least one judge’s list understates his number of pending…
-
What’s in a name? 2 federal judges hold ‘hearings’ differently than advertised
—
by
Soon after her appointment to Colorado’s U.S. District Court in 2021, Judge Regina M. Rodriguez implemented a new procedure for handling motions for summary judgment — meaning one party in a civil lawsuit is asking to end the case in their favor without a trial. She began requiring lawyers to identify, in chart format, all of…
-
Colorado federal judges unveil new ‘civility code,’ share stories about bad behavior
—
by
Four members of Colorado’s U.S. District Court introduced lawyers on Tuesday to a new, nonbinding “civility code” and expressed frustration about overly belligerent behavior they are seeing more frequently from attorneys. “It feeds on itself. One lawyer in a case starts with snarky comments in the briefs or the motions, the other side may try…
-
Colorado Supreme Court bars man from further legal filings due to ‘ongoing abuse’
—
by
The Colorado Supreme Court barred a Parker man on Friday from making any more legal filings by himself, finding he repeatedly pursued groundless litigation aimed at harassing his opponents. The unsigned May 23 order explained the Supreme Court had the duty to balance every person’s constitutional right to access the courts with the need to…
