insurance
-
Colorado: Health insurance premiums set to double in 2026
—
by
Health insurance rates for middle-income Coloradans who buy their own coverage are set to double in 2026, according to the state’s insurance division. The statewide net average premium increase will hit 101%, the Colorado Division of Insurance said on Monday, adding that likely will mean that 75,000 Coloradans won’t be able to afford health insurance…
-
Colorado legislators seek to stabilize health insurance premiums with federal tax credits going away
—
by
Colorado legislators are considering an infusion of cash into a program in an effort to keep health insurance premiums low amid recent changes to the tax code enacted by Congress, notably the end of tax credits offered on state-run and federal exchanges. One proposal would boost funding for the program by $100 million. Another proposal…
-
Divided appeals court says COVID-19 did not cause ‘direct physical loss’ to senior care facilities
—
by
Colorado’s second-highest court ruled on Wednesday that the COVID-19 pandemic and related public health orders did not cause a “direct physical loss” to the property of various assisted living facilities to the point of triggering insurance coverage. By 2-1, a three-judge Court of Appeals panel relied on the reasoning of recent federal court opinions and…
-
10th Circuit says judge misinterpreted meaning of ‘sudden’ in Denver property damage case
—
by
The Denver-based federal appeals court ruled on Thursday that a trial judge incorrectly interpreted the meaning of “sudden” when he concluded an insurance company need not pay for damage to a home allegedly caused by prolonged construction work nearby. Experts hired by Allstate and homeowner Michael Catalano Jr. disagreed whether the damage to Catalano’s Denver…
-
Colorado Supreme Court accepts cases on leaving the scene of accidents, insurance
—
by
The Colorado Supreme Court announced on Monday that it will consider whether prosecutors must prove defendants knew they were involved in an accident resulting in death or serious injury in order to be convicted for leaving the scene. At least three of the court’s seven members must agree to hear a case on appeal. The…
-
All about the ‘quandary’: Judges talk about when Colorado Supreme Court wades into federal cases
—
by
For the most part, cases that are filed in state court proceed linearly through the state trial courts, appellate court and Supreme Court. Likewise, federal cases are heard by a federal trial judge, a federal appeals court and, on rare occasions, the nation’s highest court. But sometimes, when a federal case involves a question of…
-
Colorado justices to hear cases on ‘borrowed’ allegations, policyholders’ failure to cooperate
—
by
The Colorado Supreme Court announced on Monday that it will hear an appeal asking whether lawyers can incorporate allegations from other lawsuits into their own complaints without personally speaking with witnesses in the prior cases first. At least three of the court’s seven members must agree to hear a case on appeal. The justices will…
-
Colorado Supreme Court hears plea to open up path for construction defects lawsuits
—
by
For decades, the Colorado Supreme Court has recognized that some civil liability claims like negligence are meant to protect all citizens from harm without the need for an agreement or contract. On the other hand, parties can enter into contracts and litigate breach of contract lawsuits when someone fails to respect the bargain. To reinforce…
-
Colorado justices to hear cases on defendant who blamed mom, car rental companies as insurers
—
by
The Colorado Supreme Court announced last week that it will analyze whether a person can be convicted of attempting to influence a public servant when they enlist another party to perform the deceit, and whether vehicle rental companies can be held legally liable as insurers when they choose to offer insurance policies. At least three…
-
Colorado Supreme Court clarifies path for proving insurers’ unreasonable delay of benefits
—
by
The Colorado Supreme Court delivered a decision with mixed benefits to insurance companies and policyholders on Monday, ruling that insurers’ internal evaluations of claims cannot be used to prove how much they owe a plaintiff, but companies also cannot hide behind ambiguity to delay paying certain types of damages. Under state law, insurers cannot unreasonably…
