Colorado Politics

Gov. Jared Polis releases stance on 14 ballot measures for 2024 election


Collection Colorado Voter Guide: 2024 General Election

After receiving requests in September to make public his stance on this year’s extensive list of amendment and propositions on the 2024 ballot, Gov. Jared Polis has released his stance on all 14.  

“Like you, I am only one vote, so I encourage everyone to read up on the initiatives and make an informed decision,” he said. 

Here’s a breakdown of how Polis plans to vote on the 14 ballot measures this November. 

Amendment G — Yes

This constitutional amendment, referred by the state legislature, would expand the state’s homestead property tax exemption. It changes the eligibility criteria for veterans from requiring a 100% disability status to instead mandating proof of unemployability, which generally requires a service-connected disability rating of 60% or higher. According to Polis, the amendment would extend tax exemptions to about 3,400 more veterans across the state. 

“Since I want to help make Colorado the BEST state for veterans, I will be voting YES ON AMENDMENT G,” he wrote. 

Amendment H — Yes 

This concurrent resolution from the legislature proposes establishing an independent judicial discipline adjudicative board to set standards for judicial review of discipline cases and clarify when discipline proceedings should become public. 

Polis said the amendment seeks to address “several recent scandals” in the judicial branch of government and added he will be voting in its favor. 

Amendment I —  Yes

This legislatively-referred measure would create an exemption to the right to bail in first degree murder cases when “proof is evident or presumption is great.”

“This will help make Colorado safer and I will be voting YES ON AMENDMENT I,” said Polis.

Amendment J — Yes

This measure was referred by the legislature and seeks to amend the state Constitution’s definition of marriage by removing a section stating that only marriages between a man and a woman are valid in Colorado. 
 
Polis said the amendment is a protective measure in case the Supreme Court ever reverses the decision to federally legalize same-sex marriage.
 
“This Amendment simply removes that antiquated language preventing same sex marriage from the state constitution,” wrote Polis. “As someone who happens to be in a same-sex marriage, I strongly support this Amendment. I will be voting YES ON AMENDEMENT J.”

Amendment K — Yes

This legislatively-referred amendment would move up some of the state’s election deadlines so clerks have more time to finalize ballots before elections. 

“While I will probably research it a bit more, for now I plan to vote YES ON AMENDMENT K,” Polis wrote. 

Amendment 79 — Yes

This citizen-referred amendment enshrines the right to abortion into the state’s Constitution. 
 
“I am pro-choice, and this amendment would enshrine the right to choose in our state constitution,” said Polis. “It’s already protected in state law but protecting it in our state constitution is stronger. I will be voting YES ON Amendment 79.”
 
Proposition 127 — Neutral
 
This proposition, backed by the group Cats Aren’t Trophies, would prohibit the hunting of bobcats, lynx, and mountain lions in the state. While hunting lynx is currently federally prohibited, the proposition would ensure the species would be protected if they were ever de-listed from the Federal Endangered Species Act.
 
“Whether this passes or not, I’m confident that Colorado Parks and Wildlife will be able to continue to manage our wildlife effectively to ensure ecological diversity with plenty of opportunities for big game hunting,” said Polis. “I would love to hear what others think on this one, and I probably won’t have a strong opinion one way or the other, but will certainly work to successfully implement the will of the voters either way. I am NEUTRAL ON PROPOSITION 127.”
 
Proposition 128 — Neutral
 
Backed by the group Advance Colorado, this proposition would require individuals convicted of certain violent crimes that occurred before January 1, 2025 to serve 85% of their sentence before being eligible for parole. For crimes committed on or after January 1, 2025, those with two prior convictions for violent crimes will be required to serve their full sentence before being eligible for parole.
 
“I haven’t made up my mind on this one and would love to hear your thoughts,” Polis wrote. “In general, I do support tougher sentencing for the worst violent crimes like murder and assault, but I’m not sure micromanaging parole or interfering in judicial discretion is the way to go. I think it might be better to have discretion to fit the crime, the victim’s input, and the circumstances than to lock it in at 85%, but I’m open to the concept. I am NEUTRAL ON PROPOSITION 128.”
 
Amendment 80 — Neutral 
 
Also backed by Advance Colorado, this amendment would establish the right to school choice for K-12 education and declare that school choice includes neighborhood, charter and private schools, home schooling, open enrollment options and any future innovations in education.
 
“I generally support this concept, but I’m not sure exactly what a constitutional right would mean legally,” Polis stated. “Maybe it means that a parent could sue if the state ever tried to ban homeschooling or private school? In that case, it would be good to give parents more rights. On the other hand, it could lead to costly litigation with uncertain outcomes. I am NEUTRAL ON Amendment 80.”
 
Proposition 129 — Yes
 
This measure, backed by the animal rescue organization Dumb Friends League, would create a new position within the veterinary field called a veterinary professional associate. As envisioned by backers, the position would serve as a bridge between veterinary technicians, who typically hold an Associate’s Degree, and doctors of veterinary medicine, who require an additional eight years of schooling. 
 
“I think this is a great idea, and we have something similar in human medicine with Physicians Assistants and Nurse Practitioners,” wrote Polis. “It would be great to have it as an option for veterinarians to expand the bandwidth of their practices, too, and it will help save people money on veterinary bills for pets and also better support our ranchers in rural areas with severe veterinary shortages. I will be voting YES ON PROPOSITION 129.”
 
Proposition 130 — Yes
 
This measure is also backed by Advance Colorado and would establish a $350 million fund to help pay for for the training, hiring, and salaries for law enforcement officers. It would also create a death benefit fund for the survivors of police, firefighters, or first responders killed in the line of duty. 
 
“This initiative will support our men and women in blue and help make Colorado safer and I plan to vote YES ON Proposition 130,” said Polis. 
 
Proposition 131 — Yes 
 
Backed by former DaVita Dialysis CEO Kent Thiry, this proposition would change the state’s elections system by allowing all candidates would appear on primary ballots. The top four vote-getters, regardless of party affiliation, would advance to the general election. During the general election, voters would rank the four candidates in order of preference, rather than selecting just one. 
 
“While Colorado has among the best voter integrity and access protections, no system of voting is perfect, and I think instant runoff voting is better than our current system because it gives voters more choices,” said Polis. “I’m hopeful that if it passes it will encourage participation and improve our democracy. I will be voting YES ON Proposition 131.”

Proposition JJ — Yes

This legislatively referred measure would allow the state to keep and utilize all sports betting tax revenue over $29 million to fund water conservation and protection projects, instead of refunding them to casinos. 

“While I have mixed feelings about sports betting, I support being able to use the full amount of the taxes already approved by voters generated for water projects rather than refund them to gaming companies,” Polis said. “I will be voting YES ON PROPOSITION JJ.”

Proposition KK — Yes

Referred by the legislature, this proposition would implement a 6.5% excise tax on gun dealers, manufacturers, and ammunition vendors. The revenue generated from this tax would go toward funding for mental health services, gun violence prevention, and services for victims of domestic violence and other crimes.
 
“While higher tax levels were discussed early in the process, I was pleased that proponents brought it down to 6.5%, which I think is a reasonable level, and we do need more funding for school safety and victim services and will help make Colorado one of the ten safest states,” said Polis. “I plan to vote YES ON PROPOSITION KK.”
 

Tags

PREV

PREVIOUS

Jefferson County Amendment 1A | 2024 VOTER GUIDE

Amendment 1A permits Jefferson County voters to retain and spend taxes collected above the limits imposed by the Taxpayer’s Bill of Rights. Jefferson County is one of a few counties that still operate under the TABOR limits. Officials said the funds would be used primarily for transportation and infrastructure, including maintaining roads, bridges, and other […]

NEXT

NEXT UP

Fundraising for Colorado's ballot measures picks up with less than three weeks before Election Day

With less than three weeks to go to Election Day, groups working on some of the 14 statewide ballot measures are getting ready for the final spending push. And the backer of Colorado’s most advertised ballot measure has been making contributions to other issue committees in the last 48 hours. Here is the list, in […]


Welcome Back.

Streak: 9 days i

Stories you've missed since your last login:

Stories you've saved for later:

Recommended stories based on your interests:

Edit my interests