Colorado Politics

The Pueblo Chieftain: Vote ‘yes’ on 109, ‘no’ on 110

When you think about the top challenges facing Pueblo today, new road construction probably isn’t very high on your list. Road maintenance, maybe. Which our city leaders are supposed to be addressing through the establishment of a street maintenance enterprise fund.

But Pueblo is largely free of the blood pressure-raising traffic congestion that plagues our neighbors to the north in the Colorado Springs and Denver metropolitan areas. It’s important to keep that in perspective when considering Proposition 109 and Proposition 110, two statewide ballot initiatives that take different approaches to transportation funding.

If Proposition 109 passes, the state would borrow up to $3.5 billion by selling transportation revenue bonds. These would be repaid within 20 years, using existing state revenue sources.

Read more at The Pueblo Chieftain.

Tags

PREV

PREVIOUS

The Colorado Springs Gazette: We were wrong on Colorado Amendment 74

The Gazette’s editorial board erred on the side of property rights but erred nonetheless with our initial support for Amendment 74. Voters could easily make a similar mistake, so we urge readers to consider the full ramifications of this ballot measure. The proposal sounds more American than standing for the flag. The ballot asks voters: […]

NEXT

NEXT UP

Steamboat Pilot & Today: Vote ‘yes’ on Prop. 110, ‘no’ on Prop. 109

With the gap between the list of state transportation projects and available funding widening to almost $10 billion, it’s no surprise that two state transportation initiatives have landed on the November ballot. Propositions 109 and 110 both propose to fix Colorado’s transportation problems, but their approaches are very different. Colorado finds itself in a transportation […]


Welcome Back.

Streak: 9 days i

Stories you've missed since your last login:

Stories you've saved for later:

Recommended stories based on your interests:

Edit my interests