What to know before Lakewood’s zoning special election
Contentious Lakewood zoning changes will be decided by voters at the beginning of next month.
Ballots have been sent to all active registered Lakewood voters ahead of the April 7 special election that will cost the city $155,000 to conduct, according to a Feb. 22 City Council meeting document.
Discussions have become rampant on social media, with both sides sharing arguments for and against the city’s zoning changes.
The special election comes after a battle regarding the zoning changes that started last summer when the council decided to spread the approval of a nearly 400-page zoning code update across separate meetings. The proposal, in its entirety, was approved on Oct. 13 and took effect at the beginning of the year.
Four petitions were then turned in to the city at the end of last year by groups like Lakewood Citizens Alliance and Lakewood Stronger Together to repeal four specific ordinances.
Once deemed sufficient, the City Council had two options on how to deal with the petitions: hold an election or repeal the ordinances. The board chose an election.
The ballot has four questions regarding ordinances 2025-27, 28, 29 and 30.
The confusion, according to some residents, is exactly what people should vote for if they are in support of the changes.
Basically, due to the election being caused by a petition to repeal the already approved ordinances, a “yes” vote would be saying that the zoning should go back to the way it was before the 2025 changes.
A “no” vote, on the other hand, would keep the new zoning outlined in the specific ordinances.
So, “yes” means voters don’t approve of the zoning changes made last year and are in favor of repealing the ordinances. “No’ means voters do approve of the new ordinances.
What are the ordinances?
Ordinance 2025-29, which has drawn the most ire from opposition, removed the term “single-family zoning” from city documents. In its place, the city adopted the term “residential dwellings” — an umbrella category encompassing single-family homes, duplexes, tri-plexes, and townhomes, aimed at expanding affordable housing options.
While Lakewood has never enforced strictly single-family-only zoning — historically permitting uses such as group homes and duplexes throughout the city — the new language formally opens all areas to multi-family residences.
Opposing groups that garnered petition signatures, like Lakewood Citizens Alliance and Lakewood Stronger Together, argue that the changes would affect the city’s “unique character” and damage single-family neighborhoods with overdevelopment, according to door knockers placed on homes last week.
Proponents, like Make Lakewood Livable, say the zoning changes would help create homes for the missing middle — or people who cannot afford current single-family homes but make too much money to benefit from low-income housing.
Ordinance 2025-27 involves the elimination of parking minimums for residences located in transit corridors and designated affordable housing developments. Outside of those exemptions, parking requirements in residential areas remain tied to square footage — for instance, standard neighborhoods require three spaces per 1,000 square feet of living space.
The remaining two ordinances address updated zoning definitions and planning procedures (Ordinance 2025-28) and revisions to the city’s zoning map (Ordinance 2025-30). The full scope of these changes, along with the council’s rationale, is outlined in a resolution passed by the City Council in February, urging voters to keep the zoning changes.
What are people saying?
Discussions about the election have spread across social media over the last few days, but opinions have been shared for almost a year.
Sophia Mayott-Guerrero, Make Lakewood Livable campaign manager and a former City Council member, told The Denver Gazette that opposition has been sharing “misinformation” and “fear-mongering.”
“Housing costs and availability are a top concern in Colorado right now,” she said. “Young people need more affordable housing in order to thrive, and seniors need options for downsizing without being forced out of their community. Helping solve those problems is at the core of the zoning updates.”
Karen Gordey, head of Lakewood Citizens Alliance, told The Denver Gazette that major land-use decisions should be made by the people, not the City Council.
“A special election provides the transparency and voter participation necessary for the community to decide the future of its neighborhoods and the city as a whole,” she said.
Residents online mostly seem to side with keeping the zoning changes, but some disagree.
“We have an absolute glut of already dense condo housing for sale in the metro area, Lakewood included. Condos are the cheapest they’ve been in many years, they’ve reverted back to pre-COVID prices and then some,” one user said in opposition on a Lakewood Reddit post.
“I think that a little increased density will support improved walkability, more local businesses and more affordable housing. A larger tax base to support other services also isn’t bad,” another user said.
U.S. Sen. Michael Bennet recently endorsed Make Lakewood Livable’s campaign to keep the zoning changes the same, saying: “We need a housing market that works for working Coloradans. That means more starter homes, options for seniors to downsize and housing that people can actually afford.”
More information can be found at LakewoodCO.gov/SpecialElection.

