r. brooke jackson
-
Judge’s financial conflict does not require reopening case, 10th Circuit finds
—
by
A federal judge did violate the law when he failed to recuse himself from a case, but there is no need to reopen the lawsuit or overturn his rulings, the federal appeals court based in Denver decided on Thursday. In what appears to be the first ruling of its kind from the U.S. Court of…
-
10th Circuit ponders immunity for Colorado Springs officer in hospital room tasing
—
by
Some members of the federal appeals court based in Denver appeared skeptical on Tuesday that a Colorado Springs police officer committed a constitutional violation when he tased a man for refusing to hand over a cell phone that contained suspected evidence of child abuse. Last year, a trial judge allowed Carl Andersen Jr. to take…
-
10th Circuit upholds home search because defendant’s mom invited police to look around
—
by
The federal appeals court based in Denver has agreed police were lawfully inside an Adams County home at the explicit invitation of the defendant’s mother when they spotted the defendant’s handgun in a drawer, leading to federal charges for firearms possession. Mario Raymond Sanchez is serving a three-year sentence for possessing a weapon despite a…
-
Judge grants immunity to Cherry Creek schools officials who expelled student over anti-Semitic ‘joke’
—
by
Although the federal appeals court based in Denver decided last year that Cherry Creek School District officials violated the constitutional rights of a student by expelling him for an off-campus social media post, a judge on Friday concluded they could not be sued for their actions after all. Last July, the U.S. Court of Appeals…
-
Judge considers immunity for Cherry Creek school officials in student’s free speech case
—
by
Even though the federal appeals court based in Denver decided a high school student had plausibly claimed administrators violated his constitutional rights when they disciplined him for an anti-Semitic “joke,” a judge appeared doubtful this week that Cherry Creek School District personnel would have known their actions clearly ran afoul of the law. In July,…
-
Judge weighs immunity for prison officials in 1993 WTC bomber’s religious exercise lawsuit
—
by
A federal judge is now weighing whether prison officials at the “supermax” facility in Florence may be held liable for allegedly violating a Muslim inmate’s constitutional right to exercise his religion. Ahmad Ajaj was originally sentenced to 240 years for his role in the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center. He claimed that during…
-
10th Circuit mulls reinstating lawsuit against Vail Resorts for early COVID-19 closure
—
by
As the federal appeals court based in Denver considers whether to revive a lawsuit against Vail Resorts from passholders seeking refunds for the 2019-2020 ski season, the company’s lawyer defended its actions to halt operations at the dawn of the deadly COVID-19 pandemic. “People were gonna die. So we closed,” Michael J. Hofmann told the U.S.…
-
Divided 10th Circuit upholds own ruling rejecting immunity for church in employment lawsuit
—
by
In an unusual 6-4 decision, the federal appeals court based in Denver has refused to reconsider its ruling from earlier this year that found an Arvada church may be held legally liable for allegedly retaliating against one of its former employees. Originally decided in June by a three-judge panel, Faith Bible Chapel International and its religious…
-
10th Circuit strikes down portion of Colorado child welfare law, potentially imperiling other states
—
by
Despite the warnings from officials that striking down a portion of Colorado’s child welfare law would imperil federal funding and trigger a domino effect across nearly all states, the federal appeals court based in Denver has deemed unconstitutional Colorado’s prohibition on disclosing certain information about child abuse investigations. A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court…
-
10th Circuit rejects claim that judge sentenced man ‘in advance’
—
by
A judge in Colorado did not improperly sentence a man “in advance” when he promised the type of consequence he would impose for a repeat offense and then followed through on that promise, the federal appeals court based in Denver ruled on Monday. Maitise Crews, who has a lengthy criminal history, is serving a 21-month…
