contempt
-
Federal judge imposes $90K+ in fees, sanctions on Colorado podcaster
—
by
A federal judge this week imposed more than $90,000 in attorney fees and sanctions on a conservative podcaster whose unsubstantiated claims of election-rigging prompted a series of defamation lawsuits against him and those who broadcast the allegations. In a pair of orders on Monday and Tuesday, U.S. District Court Senior Judge William J. Martínez directed Oltmann…
-
Appeals court clarifies path for claiming lawyer was constitutionally ineffective in contempt proceedings
—
by
Colorado’s second-highest court on Thursday clarified that people who are held in contempt of court do have a way to challenge their convictions based on their lawyer’s allegedly ineffective assistance. The U.S. Supreme Court has long recognized that a convicted defendant may argue their constitutional rights were violated because their attorney’s performance was objectively unreasonable in a…
-
Appeals court confused why Arapahoe County magistrate held man in contempt
—
by
Colorado’s second-highest court last month overturned a set of decisions finding a man in contempt and subjecting him to potential jail time, with appellate judges concluding an Arapahoe County magistrate reached unclear, unsupported or confused conclusions about the man’s alleged failure to follow the separation agreement with his ex-wife. Todd Russell Lloyd’s marriage ended in…
-
Colorado Supreme Court rejects email as method to notify litigants of contempt proceedings
—
by
The Colorado Supreme Court clarified on Monday that notifying a litigant via email that they are subject to contempt proceedings is not permitted, although one justice suggested the rules should allow for such a method going forward. Under the procedural rules for civil cases, when a person is subject to contempt of court that does not…
-
Appeals court upholds contempt for defendant who destroyed phone rather than hand it over to judge
—
by
Colorado’s second-highest court agreed last week that an Arapahoe County judge properly held a criminal defendant in contempt for breaking his own cell phone to avoid handing it over to the judge as directed. A three-judge panel for the Court of Appeals noted that even if the judge’s attempt to seize the phone was illegal, the…
-
Appeals court upholds contempt for defendant who destroyed phone rather than hand it over to judge
—
by
Colorado’s second-highest court agreed last week that an Arapahoe County judge properly held a criminal defendant in contempt for breaking his own cell phone to avoid handing it over to the judge as directed. A three-judge panel for the Court of Appeals noted that even if the judge’s attempt to seize the phone was illegal, the…
-
Appeals court upholds contempt for defendant who destroyed phone rather than hand it over to judge
—
by
Colorado’s second-highest court agreed last week that an Arapahoe County judge properly held a criminal defendant in contempt for breaking his own cell phone to avoid handing it over to the judge as directed. A three-judge panel for the Court of Appeals noted that even if the judge’s attempt to seize the phone was illegal, the…