Maintain statewide pesticide regulations | FEEDBACK

On Sept. 12, Longmont Mayor Joan Peck appeared on a panel promoting local control of pesticides in Colorado during a Water Resources and Agriculture Review Committee meeting. Colorado Politics quoted Mayor Peck (“Pesticide regulation: Environmentalists, ag industry clash over local versus state control“) testifying her community uses goats for weed control, which, she said, has “worked very well.”

As a plant scientist and Longmont resident, I can attest that this view isn’t backed by any discernible evidence. In fact, invasive weeds on public lands pose significant risk to surrounding farmland. Kochia, an invasive plant, sets more than 100,000 seeds that could end up in irrigation water that flows downstream to farms. What happens in Longmont doesn’t stay in Longmont.

Mayor Peck’s comments demonstrate why so many farmers and consumers are concerned about efforts to weaken Colorado’s robust pesticide regulations in favor of locally-mandated regulations. Weeds are among the most dangerous pests to food production, and inadequate pest management leads to 40% of all food waste, according to a report released in 2020 by the UN. Kochia in particular, imparts exponential yield losses.

Stay up to speed: Sign-up for daily opinion in your inbox Monday-Friday

If cities like Longmont set their own pesticide regulations that forego safe pest management practices, it could lower farm output, increase farming’s environmental impact, increase food prices and make it harder for Colorado’s agricultural industry to operate. Current state regulations are proven safe and effective at protecting our farms and communities, and they should be maintained.

Rebecca Larson, Ph.D.

VP and Chief Scientist

Western Sugar Cooperative

Send us your feedback: Click here.

One example of what pesticide applicators would face if the state were to lift its preemption on pesticides: the light-shaded asphalt is Denver County; the dark is unincorporated Arapahoe County. The tree in the middle straddles both counties, which raises questions about which pesticide an applicator could use to treat the tree, or how to protect one side of the tree from pesticides that are permitted in one county but not the other. (PHOTO: Alex Brown) 
MarianneGoodland, Colorado Politicsmarianne.goodland@coloradopolitics.comhttps://www.coloradopolitics.com/content/tncms/avatars/e/f4/1f4/ef41f4f8-e85e-11e8-80e7-d3245243371d.444a4dcb020417f72fef69ff9eb8cf03.png
Tags

PREV

PREVIOUS

Colorado’s small biz turns thumbs down on HH | Denver Gazette

It’s no surprise Colorado’s small businesses aren’t buying Proposition HH, the bait-and-shaft tax measure on this fall’s statewide ballot. After all, the resilient mom ‘n’ pop shops, upstart entrepreneurs and other small-scale employers who create so many of our jobs and bring us so many of our goods and services – are used to scrutinizing […]

NEXT

NEXT UP

Done right, clean energy as reliable as traditional sources | OPINION

Robert Kenney It is National Clean Energy Week, a time to celebrate our collective progress toward systems that power our lives without greenhouse gas emissions. In my role at Xcel Energy, which has advanced one of the most ambitious clean-energy visions in the U.S., I see enormous potential for our state to develop more sustainable […]


Welcome Back.

Streak: 9 days i

Stories you've missed since your last login:

Stories you've saved for later:

Recommended stories based on your interests:

Edit my interests