John F. Martin

John F. Martin

We all agree Denver and the north Front Range have an ozone problem. But why do our state's regulators — along with assorted anti-oil and gas groups — want rural Coloradans to help pay to fix it?

Only the Front Range can truly resolve this issue, yet rural economies may become collateral damage if the Colorado Air Pollution Control Division and some like-minded groups get their way over the next several days at a rule-making hearing in Denver.

The Western and Rural Local Governments Coalition, of which Garfield County is a leading member, consists of 23 counties and towns in rural western and eastern Colorado. We represent 30 percent of Colorado’s land area and 45 percent of active oil and gas wells.

Jon Becker

Jon Becker

Our coalition supports most of the new state regulator-proposed oil and gas rules, which include measures that are more stringent than anywhere else in the country. However, we have drawn the line just short of the full package of aggressive controls being proposed.

We hope to spare rural economies the great expense of rules that offer little or no prospect for solving the true causes of the air quality problem — Front Range growth, transportation, oil-and-gas activity, and complex topography and weather.

Those root causes of the ozone problem in Denver are not ones for which rural Coloradans should be paying. And make no mistake: We will pay dearly if the state and other parties get their way.

We support proposed revisions to oil and gas air quality regulations that will reduce methane and ozone-forming volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions, because we value clean air and protecting the environment for our citizens. We draw the line at several extreme proposed controls that will inflict great cost and economic consequences on western and rural Colorado and produce little to no benefit to air quality.

Fortunately, Colorado law is on our side in this regard, requiring that costs and benefits be balanced. And under the law, affected persons, like rural Coloradans who already enjoy good air quality, have to be spared the economic hardship of one-size-fits-all rules meant to address Denver’s ozone problem.

There’s a lot of talk about these proposed air regulations being adopted as a part of Senate Bill 19-181, which passed last April and is intended to provide additional public welfare protections regarding the conduct of oil and gas operations. Our concern is how the proposed regulations will harm public welfare in rural Colorado, and it should be your concern, too.

Much of the talk in favor of the most extreme proposed air emission control requirements is based on emotional, not fact-based appeals for uniform, statewide rules thought to be necessary to protect public health.

One argument is uniform controls will provide everyone equal protections. However, this is not true. Federal ozone standards protect everyone, and the most extreme measures are warranted only in areas that don’t meet health-based standards or are contributing materially to the failure to meet those standards.

Another claim is that western and rural areas have a serious ozone problem. The reality is quite different. Air quality in western and rural counties is in fact good and getting better. Since 2008, Garfield County has invested in ozone and VOC air monitoring, and studies prove this point beyond any doubt.

We are greatly concerned for the public welfare of rural Coloradans and the harm that will result from imposing these extreme air-emission controls, which are only appropriate for Denver and the north Front Range.

Imposing aggressive controls on rural, clean-air regions will have serious economic consequences for our counties and communities. We believe significant emission-control costs will force operators of the lowest producing and emitting wells to simply “shut in” these wells and terminate production, cutting off revenues that support essential public services and programs in rural Colorado.

State regulators are ignoring the very real economic consequences of adopting their proposed rules statewide. If you’re like us, a son or daughter of rural Colorado, this should scare you. Thinking about the harm these extreme and ineffective air emissions controls will cause western and rural Colorado takes our breath away — and it should yours, too.

John F. Martin is the chair of the Board of County Commissioners for Garfield County. Jon Becker is the District 2 commissioner for Morgan County.

(1) comment

Guest

I grew up in Bakersfield CA.....moved to CO in 97 and now live in the Great State of Texas. This CO air board sound a lot like the liberal communist CA Air Pollution Board.....a bunch of unelected bureaucrats who want to control the lives of every citizen in the state. I don't remember this group when I lived there. I highly recommend that the citizens of CO stop this rogue group of liberal wingnuts before they gain the power they seek. They have destroyed CA industries and will do the same to CO.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.