Coloradans rejected — wisely, in our estimation — Proposition 112, which would have increased setbacks for new oil and gas development to nearly half a mile from occupied structures — something opponents called a "de facto" ban on drilling.

We opposed 112 on the premise that it was using a chainsaw to address a problem where small, surgical cuts are required to prevent economic upheaval. But Prop 112's inclusion on the ballot — along with the similarly rejected Amendment 74 — served a useful purpose, if only temporarily.

Read more at The Grand Junction Daily Sentinel.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.