SPONSORED: CSPR study underscores the need for PERA reform


Rarely does any issue in the Colorado Legislature garner unanimous agreement. This year, the stakes are too high to ignore and on the issue of Public Employees Retirement Association (PERA) reform. Every lawmaker, policy expert, the Governor, and interest group agree, PERA, the Public Employee Retirement Association, must be reformed.

Since the mid-2000s, the amount of money state and local taxpayers have put into PERA has dramatically increased. In 2016, for instance, additional employer contributions meant to exclusively pay down the unfunded liability cost taxpayers roughly $720 million. These dollars are a huge financial drain on the state budget, school districts, cities and counties across Colorado.

PERA is a liability impacting every area of the state budget and it must be addressed. The Colorado Education Association (CEA) lists a PERA fix among their tree top priorities this year and it’s no wonder. Consider the PERA impact on issues like teacher recruitment. In Colorado, benefits for retired teachers are growing at a faster rate than salaries for new hires leaving little to no financial incentive for recruitment.

Understanding the extent of the problem is the first step to solving it. In his opening day remarks, Senate President Kevin Grantham described the issue, “The magnitude of the problem is larger than many believe. This is large enough to affect the credit rating of the State and public institutions – and raise bonding costs for all important public construction projects. This unfunded liability is a debt in excess of $10,000 per man, woman, and child in Colorado.”

The Common Sense Policy Roundtable (CSPR), a Colorado based free-enterprise think tank, and the REMI Partnership recently released a new study, “One Step Further on PERA Reform,” that explores ways to provide some relief to state and local governments and deal with the pension system’s $32 billion unfunded liability at the same time.

“Annual pension costs for school districts, cities, counties and other public institutions have doubled over the past decade to roughly $1.6 billion per year,” said Chris Brown, CSPR Director of Research & Policy. “There are ways to ease the heavy burden of these annual pension costs and eliminate the long-term $32 billion unfunded liability at the same time. And it can be done with a few adjustments to the plans already put forward by the PERA Board and Hickenlooper Administration, without undermining retirement security for our public workforce.”

According to CSPR, the last major corrective measure, Senate Bill 1 in 2010 was passed with the idea that the measure would put the financials back on track to a 100% funded ratio.  Senate Bill 10-0001 did not solve the problem. In fact, the unfunded liability has grown and so has the cost – by 45% since 2010 for the largest divisions – now costing the PERA members and taxpayers an additional $800,000,000 a year.

As the solvency of Colorado’s public pension system grows increasingly worse, Colorado is faced with another critical juncture and need for substantive reforms to PERA. State Legislators are currently grappling with amendments to SB 18-200 as a vehicle to address the problem.

“A plan that eliminates the unfunded liability by forcing school districts, state agencies and local governments to pay even more would be no real victory at all,” said Earl Wright, Chairman of the Common Sense Policy Roundtable (CSPR) Board of Directors. “Annual pension costs are crushing state, local and school district budgets and crowding out badly needed investments in roads, schools and other essential public services.”

“The research also shows average retirement benefits are growing faster than average paychecks for public employees who are still in the workforce, as rising pension costs reduce the funds available for raises,” continued Earl Wright.

“This study does not support or oppose any one reform plan, but instead puts the concerns of Colorado taxpayers front and center. The $32 billion unfunded liability must be eliminated, of course, and we urge all stakeholders to find a solution this year. But whatever solution is found, the rising annual cost of PERA contributions to school boards, local governments, the state budget and ultimately taxpayers must be a key consideration throughout the debate. It shouldn’t be swept under the rug or treated as an afterthought,” Wright concluded.

About the REMI Partnership: Common Sense Policy Roundtable, Colorado Concern, Colorado Association of REALTORS®, Colorado Bankers Association, and Denver South Economic Development Partnership have partnered to develop independent, fact-based analysis that quantifies the broader economic impacts associated with policy changes. The partnership has provided Colorado lawmakers, policy makers, business leaders, and citizens with greater insight into the economic impact of public policy decisions that face the state and surrounding regions.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.