Two Colorado Republican lawmakers are calling for an audit of the fund being used to pay for the legal expenses of former Gov. John Hickenlooper in an ethics complaint.
Sen. Paul Lundeen, R-Monument, and Rep. Rod Bockenfeld, R-Watkins, sent a letter to the chair and vice-chair of the Legislative Audit Committee on Thursday, seeking an investigation into "the inappropriate, perhaps illegal" use of federal dollars for Hickenlooper's legal bills. Bockenfeld and Lundeen are both members of the audit committee.
As reported by the Denver Post on Wednesday, a 2003 federal grant to Colorado, known as the Jobs and Growth Tax Reconciliation Act of 2003, is being used to pay attorney Mark Grueskin to represent Hickenlooper on two ethics complaints filed against him in Oct. 2018 by former Republican Speaker of the House Frank McNulty.
That letter, which was obtained by Colorado Politics, said those federal dollars were intended to "jump start" Colorado's post-9/11 economy. According to an executive order from then-Gov. Bill Owens, the dollars were to provide "essential government services or to cover the costs of certain unfunded federal mandates."
The letter said the executive order does not say anything about being used to cover legal bills for Hickenlooper's private lawyers. Since it does not allow for those kinds of expenses, no argument can be made that paying Hickenlooper's legal bills "is an essential government service or unfunded federal mandate," the letter said.
But just as troubling, the letter continued, is that the Post reported that Grueskin's name or that of his law firm does not appear in the state's financial transparency database "associated with payments made to Mr. Grueskin" for Hickenlooper's defense.
This is not acceptable, Lundeen and Bockenfeld wrote.
The request to the committee asked that it authorize an investigation into the use of those federal funds, and why Grueskin's name was redacted from the financial database.
State Sen. Nancy Todd (D-Aurora), who chairs the audit committee, has not returned a call for comment.
Hickenlooper is facing a public hearing sometime after the first of the new year with the state's Independent Ethics Commission over travel and related expenses made primarily in 2018. Those trips included travel to the Bilderberg Conference in Italy last year, a trip to the East Coast for the commissioning of the USS Colorado, and two trips on personal business and on flights arranged by personal friends.
It has been standard practice for the state to pay for the legal expenses of elected officials who are under ethics investigations. The state paid more than $515,000 for the legal expenses of then-Secretary of State Scott Gessler for a complaint filed in 2012 that lasted until last year. In that case, the state paid for both the defendant's legal costs and for the state's legal costs, since the Attorney General's Office represents the ethics commission.
In the past two years, the state has also covered the legal costs for an outside attorney representing state Sen. Vicki Marble of Fort Collins, as well as paid for attorney general representation, albeit not all of it, for former Secretary of State Wayne Williams.
State records, however, have not always been complete with regard to how much was paid. In the Gessler case, the Secretary of State's Office could not provide invoices for the legal expenses it paid prior to July 1, 2016, citing a records retention policy of two years. That's despite a state law that says retention of records tied to lawsuits should be retained throughout the lifetime of that legal case.