Homeless Denver

An unidentified man drags his belongings away during a sweep of homeless people who were living on sidewalks near Coors Fieldin Denver on Nov. 15, 2016. 

With arguments concluded, Denver County Judge Johnny Barajas will consider the legality of Denver’s urban camping ban.

Jerry Burton received a citation under the law and decided to challenge it on the grounds that shelter capacity was insufficient to house every person living on the street.

As reported in Denverite, Chris Conner, director of Denver’s homeless services, acknowledged that while data showed available beds for single adult men, other subsets of the homeless population would have more difficulty securing a shelter spot, such as young people or couples.

Conner said that the camping ban “gives first responders the opportunity to contact people who may be experiencing homelessness and bring them to services.”

The challenge comes as courts in other states have voided camping bans and panhandling prohibitions.

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals invalidate Boise’s camping ban on the grounds that it was cruel and unusual punishment.

“As long as there is no option of sleeping indoors, the government cannot criminalize indigent, homeless people for sleeping outdoors, on public property, on the false premise they had a choice in the matter,” the court wrote.

Boise is asking the U.S. Supreme Court to consider an appeal. This fall, the Downtown Denver Partnership submitted a brief supporting the city, arguing that a “judicially created ‘right to habitate’ public spaces with a patina of constitutional supremacy” would affect cities’ ability to address homelessness, public health and safety.

Barajas also heard about the negative effects from urban camping, which can include litter, fire hazards and undisposed-of drug paraphernalia. 

This spring, Denver voters overwhelmingly upheld the law after a measure to repeal urban camping landed on the ballot.

(1) comment


The public did not vote to uphold the camping ban, they voted not to allow issue 300 to pass. There is a big difference. The camping ban is inhumane and most organizations are against it. Issue 300 provided sweeping reform to areas other than just the camping ban. Had only the camping ban been on the ballot, I believe the outcome would have been different, in part because organizations like Colorado Coalition for the Homeless would have hopefully supported it.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.