Joint Budget Committee  2021 Moreno McCluskie Rankin Ransom Hanson Herod.png

From left to right, top row: Chair Sen. Dominick Moreno, D-Commerce City; Vice Chair Rep. Julie McCluskie, D-Dillon; Sen. Bob Rankin, R-Carbondale

Bottom row: Rep. Kim Ransom, R-Littleton, Sen. Chris Hansen, D-Denver and Rep. Leslie Herod, D-Denver.

The Joint Budget Committee Wednesday got an earful from Coloradans who have watched the budget cutting with trepidation and worry about their future.

The third annual hearing offered an opportunity for the public to talk directly to the JBC about what the priorities ought to be for the state budget in 2021-22.

“It’s important to hear voices before we start setting the budget for the next fiscal year,” said JBC Chair Sen. Dominick Moreno, D-Commerce City, at the hearing's beginning.

Many of those who testified Wednesday already have a seat at the table, represented by lobbyists, nonprofits and professional organizations that will advocate for their place in the budget as figure setting gets underway.

That included state employees, who won the right to collective bargaining in the 2020 session, and who advocated for a bigger salary increase than what’s been proposed by Gov. Jared Polis. Brian Hines, a corrections officer at the Buena Vista Correctional Complex, told the JBC that corrections used to be an elite job, but the pay is now so low that people can’t survive, especially if they have to drive two hours to get to work. “People are struggling,” Hines said. And in small towns, when people leave state jobs, they leave the town, too.

Angelika Steadman, an RN at the Colorado Mental Health Institute at Pueblo, pointed out that state employees will have to pay 3% more into their pensions this year, yet the cost of living increase proposed is only 2%. “Help us break even,” she said.

Janet Snipes, the executive director at Holly Heights Nursing Care Center in Denver, testified on behalf of the association of long-term care providers. Her facility relies almost entirely on Medicaid.

"I am adamantly opposed to the [Health Care Policy and Financing] proposal to take the current nursing home reimbursements out of statutes and freeze our rates with no increase for the upcoming year," which she said ignores increased costs from inflation and costs resulting from the pandemic.

Snipes told a harrowing tale of the impact of COVID-19 on her facility, staff and residents. Her facility had an outbreak in March before testing was available and before they knew how to adequately treat COVID-19. "Staff were afraid to work because they were afraid they would die too," she said.

She said she ended up paying some of her direct care staff double-time to incentivize them to come to work, an additional cost of more than $418,000, she said, to compensate them for putting their lives at risk with no PPE and no testing. "We (had) reached out to multiple agencies" for those supplies but were told that her facility was not a priority. "I've worked in long-term care for 44 years, and this is the most emotionally traumatic period of time I've ever experienced. My staff has suffered from PTSD."  

The pandemic had other financial effects, too: a loss of residents, from 92% occupancy in March to 68% in mid-May. The facility has lost $2.7 million in revenue in 2020, she said. Medicaid nursing homes have been put in severe fiscal straits, and some have closed, she said. 

Moreno asked about the financial challenges for long-term care providers, including drops in resident numbers. More than 50 homes in Colorado have dropped below 70%, which makes it unsustainable, especially for those that rely on Medicaid, she replied. the pandemic has also made it difficult to admit residents when a facility has an outbreak. "If these budget cuts occur, we will lose most of our help."

Still others hope to avoid the budget knife altogether. Bethany Pace Danley, who works for Peer Assistance Services, a non-profit that works on substance abuse and intervention services, explained their state funding had been cut by $1 million in 2020-21 and that it has been recommended for elimination in the 2021-22 budget. She asked the JBC to reject that recommendation and restore the cut handed down in 2020-21.

The availability of one-time funds in the 2020-21 budget, revealed with the December 2020 forecast, had some groups come forward with suggestions on how to spend it. Green Latinos, represented by Ian Thomas Tafoya, suggested stationary monitoring and mobile monitoring of air quality. Reining in companies that produce toxic emissions has been difficult, he explained, because they simply do not have the data they need. One monitor, even one, is a critical first step, and would send a signal to Front Range communities that the state is working on the problem. Even in a tight budget year, it’s an investment that will pay off in the future, he said.

Higher education advocates, including students, called on better base funding for public colleges and universities. Several affiliated with Young Invincibles testified to the difficulties of finding the money for college.

That included Sara McFarland, who submitted written testimony that described the ordeal of trying to find the money for college. At 18 years old, she said, she sat in a financial aid office and “experienced an overwhelming sense of defeat in trying to stay in college.” She worked to save money, “but the harsh reality is that higher ed is available only to those who can afford it.” She said she couldn’t get private loans due to a low credit score. “Not every young adult has a down payment for school” and Pell Grants can only be stretched so far, she said. Even with grants and a scholarship, tuition is so ‘“grossly inflated” that it leaves a hole too large to fill, she said.

Thursday, the JBC began some of the figure-setting for the 2021-22 budget, looking at compensation for state employees and provider rates for health care services paid for by Medicaid. The committee has already finished working on supplemental bills for state agencies to realign their 2020-21 budgets, which will be among the first items to be dealt with when the General Assembly returns.

One piece of good news for K-12: lower enrollment from the October student count could have meant a cut of nearly $41 million, given that state funding to school districts is a per-pupil calculation. However, the JBC will introduce a bill to hold the funding in the 2020-21 budget stable.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.