Polis health care road map

Gov. Jared Polis announces his administration's accomplishments on reducing health care costs, as his lieutenant governor, Dianne Primavera, marks them off during a press conference at the Colorado Capitol on Thursday, Feb. 27, 2020.

A signature piece of legislation for Gov. Jared Polis, a public option health care policy, wasn't nearly what those on the march to single-payer health care would have hoped for.

This is a pragmatic progressive governor who gave up a congressional seat, after helping drive the implementation of Obamacare, largely on a promise to save people money on their health care.

The public option is a watered-down version of a threat: shave 15% off premiums across the board, or face the wrath of government competition and bureaucratic rate setting.

That's something Democrats consider to be better than nothing, and you'll hear them say on the campaign trail they passed the public option, which they did not. They passed something that started out being called a public option, but that's like saying you beat Alabama in football after you edged out Colorado Mesa State.

RELATED:

In politics, a touchdown is a touchdown.

My friend Chris Brown, the vice president of policy and research at the Common Sense Institute, gets flabbergasted, as much as a wonky brainiac can, over the right-brain logic, or lack thereof, of what's going on.

The government is saying cut costs, period, with little consideration for why the costs are what they are.

Factor in across-the-board formulas, and somebody is going to pay, starting with people who will lose their jobs or won't get one in the contracted health care industry and potentially hitting rural communities barely hanging on to a local clinic.

A three-year window was a compromise that served a political purpose. The legislature could look much different in three years, when the time to crack down on hospitals and insurance companies is largely somebody else's political nightmare.

If you're grading Democrats on health care, the public option gets an I for incomplete.

As first-term signature achievements on health care and the environment go, however, Polis has been a graffiti artist.

He drove and signed a reinsurance bill that slashed overall premiums simply by moving high-risk and high-cost customers into a separate pool supported by taxpayers and new fees on hospitals.

Democrats made it easier for groups, including counties and trade professions, to band together to form a co-op to get cheaper group rates. Democrats also capped out-of-pocket insulin prices at $100 (with additional safeguards this year) and took on surprise billing by out-of-network providers in 2019. They followed up this year with Senate Bill 175 to create the Prescription Drug Affordability Board, which will require drug makers to justify their seemingly willy-nilly price hikes. Understanding why things cost what they cost before mandating a price cut — what a novel idea.

Public what, option how?

I'm sure I'll be moderating a few debates next year between Polis and the yet-to-be-mentioned Republican challenger. I'm not sure I'd include a question about what went wrong with the public option.

"Babe Ruth had a lifetime batting average of .342," the baseball-loving governor might reply. "I'm hitting way better than 1-for-3."

That's not to say Polis and the Democrats haven't sometimes acted like their majorities are carved into Yule Creek marble.

This session, Polis had to step in and threaten a veto to derail Senate Bill 200, which would have given state regulators more aggressive, unilateral powers to enact politically unattainable curbs on oil and gas production, just two years after the state adopted its first climate action plan to do that very thing.

Back then it was the best thing ever. Now it was never good enough. This is how political missions creep: crack open the door before you kick it in.

Nonetheless, you have to question the stability of a party where some Democrats, the week before they put the legislation on ice, rile up a protest crowd in the hometown of their party's governor, the same hometown as Steve Fenberg, the fast-rising Senate majority leader who slow-walked the bill until it ran out of steam. Fenberg is the same chamber boss who singularly controls the fate of future bills. That's the protest you should worry about, if you're a lawmaker.

A small handful of Democrats could slink to the background at the next governor's mansion gathering, if they're invited.

Moreover, redistricting is in the works right now with more of a premium than ever on competitive districts. Incumbents in both parties who have grown used to easy rides on Election Day likely will face a more moderate playing field next year.

Republicans would need a seismic shift to flip a 41-24 margin in the House next year, but the 19-16 Senate spread needs to flip two seats to reestablish a Republican firewall against the Democrats' agenda. That vastly complicates at least the first two years of the governor's second term, when Polis has nothing to lose by letting all of his progressive ideas hang out, assuming he has no designs on returning to Washington.

I don't assume that. I assume Polis will be the president of the University of Colorado someday. The Buffs sure weren't satisfied with a former conservative congressman from Minnesota, Mark Kennedy, so their hometown governor might fit right in. 

If Polis and the Democrats want to leave a legacy on health care and climate change, however, the future is now, not in three years when their health care bills come due.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.